Daniel Bwala, former spokesman for the Atiku Abubakar/Ifeanyi Okowa presidential campaign in the 2023 election, has criticized supporters of Peter Obi, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP). In a recent appearance on Channels Television’ s Morning Brief, Bwala asserted that many Obidients, as Obi’ s supporters are known, are members or sympathizers of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). He claimed that Obi has no substantial democratic credentials, either from his time as a student, his professional life, or any involvement in human rights advocacy, civil society, or philanthropy. ..Read Full Article
Bwala expressed his views on social media, describing his frequent criticisms of Obi and his supporters as a self-defense mechanism against their alleged online bullying. He accused Obidients of being intolerant and abusive towards those who disagree with them about Peter Obi and the Nigerian Presidency. According to Bwala, these supporters act aggressively on social media, attacking others’ democratic credentials while idolizing Obi, whom he claims has no genuine democratic background.
He dismissed allegations of his obsession with Obi, stating that Obi is not a current political issue, as he did not even come second in the 2023 presidential election. Bwala framed his critiques as a defense of his rights as a private citizen, suggesting that Obidients are attempting to force their views on the Nigerian populace. He depicted them as lacking respect for the fundamental principles of a free society, accusing them of vulgarity and insisting that anyone who does not acknowledge Obi as the President of Nigeria becomes a target of their hostility.
Despite these strong accusations, Bwala admitted he had no empirical evidence to prove that the majority of Obidients are IPOB members or sympathizers, noting that his statements were based on personal opinion. His remarks have stirred controversy, reflecting the polarized nature of political discourse in Nigeria.
Bwala’ s comments come against the backdrop of ongoing debates about Nigeria’s political future and the role of various political movements. His assertion that Obi’s supporters are merely IPOB apologists raises questions about the intersection of regional and political identities in the country. This controversy highlights the intense scrutiny and criticism faced by political figures and their supporters in Nigeria’s vibrant and often contentious political landscape.
Overall, Bwala’ s critique underscores the broader challenges of navigating political loyalty and identity in Nigeria. As the nation grapples with its democratic process and political divisions, figures like Bwala and movements like the Obidients reflect the complex and often fractious nature of Nigerian politics. Whether these accusations hold any substantive truth or are merely part of political maneuvering remains a subject of public debate.
Be the first to comment